acquire the Ralph Lauren Outlet Stores

that said applicant had lawful right to take said lands tor the purposes stated in said petition and appointed commissioners to ascertain the just compensation to be paid petitioners for the same; Ralph Lauren Outlet that petitioners objected to said court entertaining said application and proceeding on said petition, because, it neither had jurisdiction of the persons of all or any of petitioners, nor of the subjectmatter of controversy, and presented said objections by motions, pleas and otherwise; that said commissioners have not yet proceeded to execute their authority except to go upon said lands to view the same, but have appointed the st day of July as the day upon Ralph Lauren Outlet Stores which they will proceed to hear evidence and execute said authority.Your petitioners now allege that it is an usurpation ami abuse of power upon the part of said circuit court to entertain jurisdiction upon said petition and application and proceeding to condemn said lands, and that said court has exceeded its Outlet Ralph Lauren legitimate powers therein; because, FirstNotice of said application was not given to any or either of your petitioners as required by law; SecondDwelling houses of your petitioners are situated upon the lands proposed Ralph Lauren Outlet to be taken; and ThirdOther defects of jurisdiction appearing upon the record.The said petitioners, therefore, pray Ralph Lauren Outlet Online that a writ of prohibition issue, &c.Pursuant to the prayer of said petition the said judge of tlns Court awarded a rule against said F. A. Guthrie, judge, &c, and the said Winifrede Railroad Company to show cause &c returnable to this Court, at its session in Charlestown, on the th day of AugustThe said F. A. Guthrie, judge, &c and the said Winifrede Railroad Company appeared in Court on the said th day of August and filed separate answers to said petition and rule. The said railroad company, in its answer, says: st. That sufficient and legal notice of the application mentioned in said petition, made by this defendant to said Polo Ralph Lauren Outlet circuit court of Kanawha county, to take certain property, set out and described in said petition and the plats exhibited therewith, was given in the mode and manner required by law to all parties entitled to such notice; and whether such notice was given or not was a matter within the province and jurisdiction Polo Outlet Online of the said circuit court to try and determine, and if any error has been committed by the said court in the adjudication of that matter, the remedy is by appeal to this Court and not by writ of prohibition. d. That it is true there is a dwelling house upon each of the lots of land proposed to be taken by this defendant in said application, designated on the plats and in the pleadings iivthe record, as lot No.and lot No but there is no dwelling house upon the lot proposed to be taken by this defendant in said application, designated on said plats and in said pleadings, as lot NoAnd the defendant denies that the fact that there is a dwelling house upon each of said lots, Nos.and , in any wav interferes with or obstructs the defendants ri?Hit to take the same upon paying to the parties entitled thereto the compensation and damages required by law, or in any Ralph Lauren Outlet Online way deprives the Polo Outlet Online said circuit court of its jurisdiction to try and determine the defendants application to take said lots and to ascertain and adjudicate in the manner required by law the compensation and damages the defendant shall be required to pay therefor. d. That there are no defects whatever in jurisdiction appearing upon the said record.That no reason whatever is shown in said petition and record why the said circuit court should not entertain jurisdiction of the aforesaid application of the defendant as to the said lot No and try and determine the same, and no sufficient and valid reason is shown why the said circuit court should not entertain jurisdiction of said application and try and determine the same as to the said lots Nos.and Polo Outlet Shirts .Wherefore the said defendant prays that the said writ of prohibition do not issue.The record Polo Outlet Shirts exhibited with the aforesaid petition shows: that the said Winifrede Railroad Company is a corporation created by

合作论坛：